Banner
We Are All Vegans Now PDF Print E-mail
Thinking Straight - Creation and Food
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Saturday, 16 October 2010 06:46

I am finally resuming my hiatus-ridden review of The Omnivore's Dilemma. Let's all hope that I quit getting distracted.

Chapter Seven is on the "Fast Food Meal," in which Pollan demonstrates that he is a fine writer, fluid with prose that is easy on the eyes. I often think he is just crazy nuts, but he is fun to read. He has been following that enormous river of corn, headwaters in Iowa, and we now come to that great delta of fast food joints.

He falls for the dosage fallacy on p. 113, where he objects to the use of TBHQ, "an antioxidant derived from petroleum that is either sprayed directly on the [chicken] nugget or the inside of the box it comes in" (p. 113). This is a form of butane, better known to you as lighter fluid, which the FDA allows to be used sparingly on our food. Now quite aside from whether or not you want your nugget to have that extra tang of freshness, Pollan goes on to say something almost completely irrelevant.

The FDA allows no more than 0.02 percent of "the oil in a nugget" to be made up of this boon from science. Pollan goes on to say that a single gram of TBHQ can cause "nausea, vomiting, ringing in the ears, delirium, a sense of suffocation, and collapse" (p. 114). Not only that, but five grams of the stuff can kill (p. 114).

Okay, so you have the nuggets proper, and then you have the oil in the nuggets. We take that oil and find that 0.02 of it can be TBHQ. How many grams is that? It turns out that Pollan doesn't tell us, but the chances are good that it is way below a single gram, a distance to be measured in light years.

Here is the dosage fallacy. Apple seeds have a cyanide compound in them, and so it would not be a good idea to save all your apple seeds in a jar over a couple of years, and then eat them all at once. Okay, so don't do that. But I have (personal confession) eaten my apples whole and entire for a long time now. And you know what? I feel fine! Trace elements do not a poison problem make.

But Pollan's real adversary is corn. He and his family chowed down at a fast food emporium, and then had somebody calculate what they had consumed.

"The sodas came out at the top, not surprisingly since they consist of little else than corn sweetener, but virtually everything else we ate revealed a high proportion of corn, too. In order of diminish corniness, this is how the laboratory measured our meal: soda (100 percent corn), milk shake (78 percent), salad dressing (65 percent), chicken nuggets (56 percent), cheeseburger (52 percent), and French fries (23 percent)" (p. 117).

But perhaps there is another conclusion to draw, not quite as grim as Pollan's indictment of the "industrial eater." Let's look at it another way: we are all vegans now!

 

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Jane Dunsworth  Saturday, October 16, 2010 6:32 pm
Do you know what would happen if you ate nothing but cellulose? You'd STARVE! But Michael Pollan wants us to eat MORE CELLULOSE!

There are so many things that could be said about the problems with much of what Americans eat. But bad logic using scary language doesn't edify anybody.
John Caneday  - funny, but...  Monday, October 18, 2010 6:48 am
"We're all vegans now!" That's great stuff.

But isn't the point of Pollan's argument that the modern diet is far too narrow? Isn't a diverse diet the sort of thing that keeps the human body healthy?

If everything we eat derives from one narrow band of the food chain, isn't it common sense that we're not going to be getting the range of nutrients needed for physical well-being?
Bert Perry  Monday, October 18, 2010 8:43 am
For reference, 10 pieces of Chicken McNuggets have about 29g of fat, hence to get to the 1 gram lethal dose, you would have to eat about 1720 Chicken McNuggets--and that if "Chez Mac" is using the maximum allowable dosage of this stuff. As a quality engineer who deals with compliance, I assure you they're not doing this.

You might, however, physically explode if your body wasn't kind enough to you to vomit after eating 100 or so of them......
James B  - Who's forcing who to eat what?  Friday, October 22, 2010 4:52 am
You are correct on the dosage fallacy. But let's say some illogical people still want to find food that doesn't contain such substances. Should the government kick in their doors with guns drawn and shut the illogical freaks down?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/the-crisis-the-attack-the-kill.html

No one is forcing anyone to abstain from TBHQ, but people are being forced to abstain from other foods, foods which have been recognized as such for thousands of years.

The people who wish to eat (for health reasons) as Pollan advises are now being harassed by swarms of officers all over the country who wish to eat out their substance quite literally. The government happens to agree with your take on the dosage fallacy, and they've got the guns to back it up.

One can only assume that they are acting on behalf of their corporate sponsors, including the makers of TBHQ.
James B  Friday, October 22, 2010 5:05 am
Pastor, I know you are very busy, but this story is moving very quickly on the civil liberties front. Since Pollan's book was issued, the federal and state government threats to food freedom have become a much bigger issue than any quibbles people have about the definition of healthy food. Perhaps it's time to defend the crazy nuts.