Banner
Am I Missing Something? PDF Print E-mail
Current Topics - Current Events
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Wednesday, 10 December 2008 09:40

Thus far I have seen that Bishop Tutu has called for Mugabe's ouster in Zimbabwe, as President Sarkozy of France has also done. Well done for both those gents. I would call for it too if anybody cared. But I have not yet seen that Bishop N.T. Wright has taken this necessary step, although I may have missed it. If he has, can anyone point me to the place? If he has not, can anyone explain it to me, since we know from Wright's teaching that the ethics of the Good Samaritan apply to African countries straight across simpliciter?



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 09:40
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Will S  Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:54 pm
What we should do is forgive Mugabe's debt.
Gene  Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:59 pm
Then it would only take 7 or 8 billion Zimbabwe dollars to buy a loaf of bread.
Nathan  Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:37 pm
Gene, it already does...
Gene  Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:57 pm
It does? Dude, that must mean that it would make no difference if we forgave the debt. Bummer. But, hey! Just think how much better we'd feel about life...
The Scylding  Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:43 am
I'm still waiting for Benedict XVI to say something. Because Mugabe is a "devout" Catholic.

I might disagree with Tutu's theology - he's a very liberal Anglican - but his moral authority and consistency when applied to politics is exemplary.
The Scylding  Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:08 am
Read it and weep: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article5323595.ece
Pete Myers  Friday, December 12, 2008 9:54 am
Frankly, Pastor Wilson, the biggest inconsistency/problem with Tom Wright is the way he treats Conservative Evangelical Christians in his diocese.

That's why a lot of CE guys over here in the UK are too overly suspicious of his theology, and can't see the good insights he has... because they can't see past the way he blocks the gospel by his actions, they assume he's denying hte gospel by his words.

I say that as a Conservative Evangelical who is really appreciative of much of Wright's work. He is a genius.

Gene  Friday, December 12, 2008 3:08 pm
Pete:

It is easy for a Yank to sit over here and tell you what to do over there in the heat of the battle. From here it is relatively easy to see the "political" responses that come from the good Bishop. Honestly, what more would anyone expect from the Bishop of Durham? On the other hand, we get these wonderful, startling, insights that he gives us. I guess I would want to encourage you to pray to have God make the startling part come out on top. Who knows what would happen then? The UK is still at the center of many things, so some very surprising results may come about. We are praying for you!

God Bless,
Pete Myers  Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:30 am
Thanks Gene!

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you "Yanks" are sitting over there and telling us what to do.

I guess I was just pointing out that guys over here aren't that much concerned with what TW does or doesn't say about developing political situations globally! I suppose that's partly because the British Evangelical scene needs to take the political and ethical implications of the gospel more seriously (though we're seeing glimmering hopes in that direction). But much of it is because of the experience guys in Durham have had of Tom Wright's ministry up close.

John's tests for Christian faithfulness are threefold: doctrinal, ethical and fellowship(ical?). I absolutely share your passion for the wonderful and startling insights Bishop Wright has made. And he seems like a godly guy. But his failure to support Evangelicals he's ruling over is felt very keenly.

Having said that even his theology is troublesome for the gospel at the moment. I've had some hairy moments in my selection for ordination simply because I believe in male headship at church. Wright isn't coming down on the right side of issues when it matters I'm afraid.

Gene  Saturday, December 13, 2008 1:59 pm
Pete:

Bummer, dude! Sorry to hear the struggles over the headship stuff. Same thing happens here to many good men in other fellowships. (Thank God for the CREC!) I think my point about the Bishop was two-fold. First, he is under pressure other than pure concern for either the church or Gospel in may situations. Being a man, he responds to the pressure he actually feels. Second, God is in control, not only of the good Bishop, but of his Archbisop and the whole church. God is moving, and you and I will marvel at what he does.

Can we pray for you? Let me know how. gene at crechouston dot org. God Bless,
Gene  Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:01 pm
Oops! "many situations" and the Archbishop actually is spelled with an "h". You can take the pastor out of the misspellings, but...
Pete Myers  Monday, December 15, 2008 2:44 am
Thanks Gene,

Obviously the situation with Wright is quite complicated. It doesn't help that the Evangelical world demonised him somewhat. It's funny how our constituency has a tendency to just filter people into "goodies", and "baddies". Unfortunately, that's now happening with the "Federal Vision" over here too... and it looks like it's falling into the "baddies" side of things.

It would help a lot, actually, if people like Doug made clear the distinctions between himself and Wright. I listened to Doug's trial the other day. I was impressed with how godly he is, and thought it was really exonerating. However, I knew immediately that what he said about Wright would be heard badly over here - and would not play in his favour.

While the Conservative evans are wrong to demonise Wright, he is a very complicated character, and gospel progress has been held back under him (I'm talking about things like godly guys not being accepted into Anglican ministry). Thanks for the offer of prayer.