And Not Like Jake Blues on His Knees Print
Thinking Straight - Global Swarming
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Wednesday, 31 August 2011 06:48

What do belief in evolution, belief in global warming, and belief in the possibility of space aliens who subscribe to a blue state recycling ethos all have in common? Well, they are all attested by Science, you rube.

I am pleased to say that I made it all the way through this article without wheezing once.

Chesterton said that the hotheads of the French Revolution appealed to the goddess Reason, which was odd, because it would appear that this was the goddess who had smiled upon them least. Cornlius Van Til pointed out the pendulum swing nature of unbelief (which is constant), but which swings back and forth between rationalism and irrationalism, like the clock on the wall. The apostle Paul said that divine judgment consists of God giving men up to the futility of intellectual kleenex fires (Rom 1:21,28). Vain imaginations about sums it up.

I had a friend once who, when he was a boy, was taken by his father for a tour of skid row. His father, who was not yet then a believer, wanted his son to see consequences that come from certain choices. I thought of that, more than once, during the course of my study of  philosophy. I thought that the unbelieving Academy ought to be treated more like an intellectual skid row, and less like a haven for "Brights," to use the howl-worthy Dawkins moniker. Fathers ought to take their sons for a walk through all the smart people departments, and ought to finish with a stern warning, when they are out in the car about to head home, that if the son doesn't play outside more, and if he decides not to try out for the football team, this could happen to him.

Evolution is not just wrong, but is also risible. Malcolm Muggeridge put it well when he said that in retrospect, it will be shown to have been one of the great jokes of history. But, someone sputters, "Science! Science! Knowledge! Education!" and I would simply reply that such incantations don't work anymore. And the climate change harum scarum is worse, because it is simultaneously silly and a naked power grab. Because they were starting to lose us on all that "the planet's gonna boil!" stuff -- because chilly facts were coming down upon us like one of Al Gore's unfortunate snowstorms, and we already had six inch accummulation -- it became necessary to introduce the alien motif. We ought to recycle because aliens might see how fast our atmosphere is heating up and undertake a preemptive invasion. Really? And also Santa Claus might see you not recycling. Don't forget the naughty and nice argument. That's an important one.

You know, a scientist ought to hypothesize in the calm of his laboratory, with books and experiments and stuff, and not like Jake Blues on his knees in front of his jilted girlfriend.

Anyone who knows anything about it knows that real scientists are willing to engage, and are willing to debate the big issues. Those who just shout you down as a heretic are only showing how far away from the spirit of free inquiry they actually are. Torquemada was not one of twelve disciples, or one of the early church fathers. He was the poster child of the whole enterprise gone completely to seed. In the same way, just as the Christian Church desperately needed her Reformation, so also does the whole realm of Science. A scientific reformation would cull from the scientific ranks all the powermongers, politicians, shamans, the high-speed computer modeling fact-maker-uppers, and space alien movie screenplay writers. How about it then? Where is our scientist Luther?

 

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
Last Updated on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 09:53
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Gianni  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 7:36 am

Amen and . . . Ahem!

Jake Elwood? You mean Jake Blues! (Spotted by my daughter!)

John Rabe  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:01 am
Yes, I don't want to miss the forest for the trees, but...as Gianni points out, it's Jake Blues. Elwood Blues is his brother. Love that scene though. "My tux didn't come back from the cleaners...and old friend came in from out of town..."
John Caneday  - our economists are as loony as our 'scientists'  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 7:57 am
Did you Paul Krugman talking about the 'fiscal stimulus' that preparing for an alien invasion would provide?

http://caneday.blogspot.com/2011/08/behold-wonders-of-science.html
Robert Seward  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:18 am
Engagingb on real issues assumes a neutrality where these discussion could be held
Rob Steele  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:56 am
Looking forward to the day you study some science and direct your risson with more precision.
Douglas Wilson  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:39 am
Rob, it looks like what I really needed to study was The Blues Brothers.
Rob Steele  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:59 am
I wouldn't recommend that movie. You've got us to review your pop-culture references anyway. There is a recent remake of True Grit that's awesome.
Taylor  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:04 am
The most grim, yet highly amusing, part of this story is that the hard science departments are usually the least risible part of intellectual skid row. The global warming/evolution/space alien thing is bad enough, but the so-called “social science” departments, like history and English, are worse. The intellectual Kleenex fires in “them thar hills” are burning away surrounded by dour, intellectually barren fruit flies. Postmodernism and other bugaboos have infected a few of my friends there.
Jake  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:12 pm
I totally agree with the comment on throwing "powermongers, politicians, shamans, the high-speed computer modeling fact-maker-uppers, and space alien movie screenplay writers" out of science, but while we're at it, shouldn't we also get rid of the atheists, agnostics, buddhists, muslims, hindus, taoists, mormons, shintoists and christians out as well?
Gianni  Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2:04 pm

Jake, no. Not the Christians. They're on a mission from God.

- Elwood

Matt Weber  Thursday, September 01, 2011 6:52 am
The Guardian article is obviously tongue-in-cheek...look at the accompanying picture.

You know, a scientist ought to hypothesize in the calm of his laboratory, with books and experiments and stuff, and not like Jake Blues on his knees in front of his jilted girlfriend.

They do, and almost all of them have concluded that natural selection is a real phenomenon. But what's the point here? You're not going to believe the conclusion no matter how many experiments anyone does.
Andrew Roggow  Thursday, September 01, 2011 9:14 am
Matt, that goes both ways. Anyone confirmed in their atheism is not going to stop believing in evolution no matter how foolish it gets. Presuppositions always comes first for everyone. Interpretation of facts is based on the presuppositions.
Matt Weber  Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:31 am
The evolutionary myth has its dogmatic adherents too, but I fail to see why that means everyone is a dogmatic adherent of some creation myth. This is more a question of attitude than intellect. If you say natural selection cannot take place because the Bible says it can't, then you look like a fool. This is because a) natural selection does take place and b) only an nutter would claim that truth is subordinate to their assumptions. It's true that fanatics on both sides of the evolution divide will never be convinced of anything they have not already decided, but who cares? It's the large majority of non-fanatics that matter.

The evolution debate would be a lot more sensible if people recognized that it's a matter of tribalism rather than science or theology or any actual pursuit of truth.
Andrew Roggow  Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 pm
Matt,

To say that everyone has presuppositions is not the same thing as saying that everyone has preconceived ideas of creation. Presuppositions are a lot more complicated than that. Everyone has faith in something. That something, whatever it may be, is inflexible for that person and provides a foundation for understanding everything else. Someone without presuppositions is like a computer without an operating system. We have to believe in something before we can understand anything else. So that means we are all fanatics, it is just a matter of what we are fanatical about and whether are fanatics are generally accepted or not. :D
Brad Donovan  Thursday, September 01, 2011 4:18 pm
Matt, when you say natural selection is observable, do you mean natural selection as a mechanism of providence, or as some impersonal idea divorced from God's control? Do you mean to say that strong ought win, or merely that it does win? What of Ecclesiastes 9:11? Solomon says that all things "under the sun" seem random and chance has dominion over strength or speed. But that is "under the sun", not true wisdom under Christ, and in the Holy Spirit. Of course unbelievers think chance and natural selection are the guiding principals of life. Unbelivers are "under the sun". Funny, but chance and selection are mutually opposite ideas. They function as a yin-yang kind of framework for most of the evolutionists I know of. Also, why do you mention the fact that we who dogmatically assert the evil of evolution and the truth of God's creation account are seen as being foolish? What should I care if a fool thinks I am foolish?
In Christ,
Matt Weber  Thursday, September 01, 2011 4:03 pm
But that's the problem...we aren't all fanatics. There is a truth out there that can be known, and sensible people will model their assumptions around that.

For that matter, if everyone were just automatons following presuppositions then no one would ever change their minds about anything. A fanatic will, when confronted with a fact that counters his prejudice, deny the fact. A sensible person will modify the prejudice. So, when someone has a treasured creation myth that says natural selection can't happen, and is then confronted with the fact that natural selection does happen, then it's on them to change their assumptions. And if they won't, they can't escape by blaming their presuppositionalist thought process.

Otherwise, maybe the postmodernists are right and we can't know the truth because our prejudices are all constructing narratives to power or whatever mumbo jumbo they say.