Banner
A Hot Little Red Sarki-car PDF Print E-mail
Practical Christian Living - Grace and Peace
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Tuesday, 30 October 2012 10:03
"At thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore" (Ps. 16: 11)

The Basket Case Chronicles #94

“If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things? If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ” (1 Cor. 9:11-12).

So the principle is plainly stated. Those who sow into the ground of the people’s spiritual lives should be able to expect receiving financial support for their labors in return. Paul asks “is it a great thing?”—meaning that it shouldn’t be considered a big deal when it happens. It should be taken as part of the ordinary course of events. Paul teaches here that a spiritual investment in a spiritual ministry ought to have a carnal return. The word he uses is sarkika – fleshly.

If others exercise this claim over the Corinthians (as other teachers were apparently doing), Paul wonders why he and his companions do not have even more of a claim. This is the way it goes. Those who have a deeper claim along with a deeper understanding forgo the claim. Those with a legitimate claim along with a more superficial understanding demand their payment—here’s the verse, what’s the problem?

Paul goes on to point out that the reason he was not being paid at the same levels as those with a lesser claim was because he knew that there was a deeper right than being right. There was a more important point than the point of the pen signing the paycheck. Paul knew that a minister can receive something that is his due, and receive it in such a way as to hinder the work he was appointed to do. Rather than do that, Paul says that he would put up with all kinds of indignities and insults rather than create (by means of a legitimate demand) a problem for the progress of the gospel. He is referring to the kind of problem that arises in the minds of those you will never have a chance to explain it to.

 

Would it be a sin for a minister to take a hefty pay raise he just got and buy a hot little red convertible sports car—his sarki-car—and then have his wife dye her hair a white kind of platinum, and then drive around the church parking lot with the top down? Is that a sin? The Bible says nothing about it being a sin one way or the other, but it would sure be stupid. Would it get in the way of the gospel? To ask the question is to answer it.



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Eric Stampher  - Reverend Harry will play for food  Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:01 am
You shine your flashlight on the elephant in the sanctuaries. Most ministers I know are no such thing as spiritual thing-sowers. They're suits with mouths. (Check that. Rarely see a suit. Too irrelevant, don't you know.)

Does every Reverend Tom, Dick and Harry deserve a paycheck? Seems to me these guys are in it for an undemanding job that offers possible adulation. "I play the pastor. Anoint me with sawbucks and praise."

But the choice to pay up is up to me, the "consumer," right? Shouldn't pay be performance based? Seems like Paul has the chutzpa and record to say "Yes."

Plus shouldn't the pay also be based on need? Paul's mission and work obviously needed and deserved solid and steady resources. And immediate action. That was obvious to Paul, anyway, and to Jesus. That's why both Paul's and my own hot little red convertible had to go on the back burner.

I'm not so sure the stuff the local Brother Joes are doing deserves more than a nickel flick. In fact, not that. Given the mission they're on and product they're producing, most of them need to get a real job. Shouldn't they should stop fleecing the flock and pay their own way?
Phil Jones  Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:02 am
If I thought the Lord were calling me to preach He would probably have to convince me in some manner reminiscent of Jonah. I think the hardest thing for preachers is remembering their is only one Billy Graham, Charles Spurgeon or Paul.
Phil Jones  Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:03 am
If I thought the Lord were calling me to preach He would probably have to convince me in some manner reminiscent of Jonah. I think the hardest thing for preachers is remembering their is only one Billy Graham, Charles Spurgeon or Paul. Greed is sinful in anyone and is especially repugnant in someone called to preach the gospel.
Toby Wilson  Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:32 am
It's not greed to want to be able to pay for your kid's braces, or to go on a vacation somewhere besides visiting relatives, or to live in a house that would be an average home for the congregation in which a man pastors.

I know there are a lot of folks who see ministry a one more career track to stardom, or as an easy buck. But the reality is that we always worry about falling in the ditch on the OTHER side of the road, not the ditch we are currently skirting. The hucksters often never get criticized in manner of the comments here from their own flock, but the earnest laborers pinching pennies to get by seem to get that kind of criticism all too often.

At the end, one has to deal with Pastor Wilson's argument from Scripture. The fact that some guys abuse their position does not invalidate the general principle--men who labor in the Gospel earn their pay the same way men who labor in the field earn their pay.

Some men labor with little pay; others are paid for little labor. That is a function of poor application of a principle, not a poor principle.
Eric Stampher  - Lounge not labor  Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:32 am
Toby,

It isn't greed. It's laziness. And maybe hubris. Pastor Wilson's argument applies only to real pastors.

Most "pastors" I know don't "labor in the Gospel." At best, they lounge.

Did you know the average American "preacher" spends over 15 hours a week "preparing" for their sermon? Imagine: 40% of their work week cloistered to give a 30 minute show no one will remember an hour later!

Meanwhile there are qualified guys in front of him who'd chomp at the bit to prepare and deliver at no charge. But no, it's his show.

And ask many, many a "pastor": "Why exactly don't you regularly touch base with the sheep, in person or by phone?" Get this -- he'll look you in the eye and tell you "I'm just not a people-person."

"Pastor." Please.
Toby Wilson  Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:54 am
Eric,

Many years ago I used to fight in the Toughman Contest that was a TV show on FX. Before every tournament the founder, Rory, would explain to us (the fighters) why he started this thing. He used to be a fighter, and then was a referee, and got tired of hearing the drunk guys in the stands talk about how they could whip the fighters in the ring. He created the Toughman Contest to give them a chance to put their money where their mouth is. Standing in the ring with the hot lights, 1,000 of your closest friends watching, and a guy across from you whose entire self-worth as a man hinges on whether he can beat you unconscious changes one's perspective.

Just food for thought.
Eric Stampher  Thursday, November 01, 2012 7:17 am
Fair enough; and I agree to step up and not just grouse.

I don't see many grousing on this though, and we do need folks calling a spade, a spade.

I've heard tell that those "Who's Got Talent" programs have over a thousand wanna bees for every one legit doer.