Banner
Your Worship Service Might Be Effeminate If . . . PDF Print E-mail
Liturgy and Worship - Liturgical Notes
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Monday, 16 April 2012 15:19

For a number of interesting reasons, Christian worship in the West has become increasingly effeminate. Leon Podles outlines some of these historical reasons in his fine book, The Church Impotent. Ann Douglas makes a fine addition to the discussion in her book, The Feminization of American Culture.

To emphasize masculinity in worship is not a practice that excludes women. Rather, it includes them, brings them along, and makes them feel safe. If you reach the men, you will reach the women. Moreover, you will find yourself reaching the worthiest of women, the true mothers in Israel. Think tent pegs and mallets.

This being the case, and in the spirit of those lists you see from time to time -- "you might be this or that if . . ." --  I would like to offer a small checklist for pastors and elders, in no particular order.

Your worship service and church community might be effeminate if . . .

1. Your music and sermons almost never contain references to judgment, wrath, battles, enemies, Hell, the devil, or apostasy;

2. Your music minister is more concerned that the choir trills their r's correctly than that they fill the sanctuary with loud sounds of battle;

3. One of the ministerial staff has taken to wearing a clerical collar and a powder pink shirt, and no one on the session has the courage to tell him that he looks like a thirteen-year-old boy with rosy cheeks, as painted by Norman Rockwell;

4. The worship team gravitates toward "Jesus is my girlfriend" songs, and their facial expressions while up front are those of guys in the backseats of their cars, having just gotten to second base with their actual girlfriends;

5. The sermons rarely deal with sin or, if they do, they deal with sins found outside the sanctuary, preferably those of secularists in Hollywood somewhere;

6. The worship music rides particular chord changes hard, with special mention being given to the shift from E Minor to C Major;

7. The minister wears a robe, but the effect is not that of being robed for battle. If that same minister were to wear a kilt, everybody would think it was a skirt from a nearby all-girls private school. But, contrariwise, if the minister were able to wear a kilt in such a way as to terrify sinners with the imagined sound of skirling bagpipes, and the sounds of a small version of Armageddon across the misty moors, and the sermon text were a claymore whistling over their heads, then that kind of man could think about a robe if he wanted;

8. The church does not practice church discipline, and not because everybody in the church is behaving. They won't practice it because the elders are misbehaving;

9. A body of elder wives, or deacon wives, or assorted volunteer women have formed a functional shadow government for the church. A vote is taken at the elders' meeting, and about a half an hour after said elders arrive at home, the phones start to ring, the emails start to get sent, and the vote starts to unravel;

10. A robust emphasis on truth, goodness, and beauty has gradually turned into a festival for posers and effete aesthetes. The beauty emphasized is not that of Bach, Rembrandt, Wren, or Lewis, but rather with the kind of pretension found at the Woodlawn Hills Literary Society;

11. This list is printed out and handed around at your church, and at least three people are mortally offended.

 

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Michael Bull  - Arsenic and old lace  Monday, April 16, 2012 4:13 pm
It's interesting that whether our worship is traditional or contemporary, both have become effeminate in their respective ways.
John Simmons  Monday, April 16, 2012 6:55 pm
Our Rector makes a cassock and surplice butch.

These are great.
Sergius Martin-George  Monday, April 16, 2012 7:01 pm
"To emphasize masculinity in worship is not a practice that excludes women. Rather, it includes them, brings them along, and makes them feel safe."

Two questions:

1) what, specifically, do you mean by "emphasizing masculinity in worship" (aside from an apophatic application of the examples of feminized worship you give in your piece)?

2) you imply that women do not feel "safe" in worship. That strikes me as odd, especially given our general agreement regarding the trend of feminized worship in contemporary evangelicalism. Why do women not feel safe in worship -- in your view?
Tammy Burns  Monday, April 16, 2012 8:06 pm
When the elders exercise church discipline, women feel safer.

Emphasis on God being our Father is masculine. The most masculine attribute is for father's to raise their sons to be men.

I'm not sure about the references to battles. Jesus is the Prince of Peace. Being a peacemaker is masculine.
Mark Buller  - Wow.  Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 pm
I'm sorry, but this is complete misogynistic nonsense for so many reasons. And if you can't see why, then you've drunk the Kool-Aid for too long.

I for one am tired of women being sidelined and put down like this. Their worship is just as 'legitimate' as ours. And since when is God more masculine than feminine? Isn't He a spirit? And doesn't he exhibit both masculine and feminine traits?

It's so silly. You want examples of 'feminine' worship? Look at every other psalm. Sure, half are battle-oriented. But only about half.
Will S  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:24 am
Hi Mark,

With regards to Christians calling our god male, keep in mind that almost every religion has deities with specific gender. For example, no one insists that muslims should call their god 'she'. No one tells Hindus that their deities should all be made indiscriminately androgynous...some are clearly male some are clearly female. And the pagans of the ancient Greco-Roman world would not have appreciated it if we called Zeus a woman or Diana a man or if we started to refer to all their gods as 'it'. In most religions, gods have gender and in every case but one (Christianity) we happily accept the gender as described by the adherents of the religion.

YHWH, God of the Bible, is referred to as a male throughout. Male pronouns, masculine verbs, etc. When YHWH became human? He came as a man. When YHWH sent his Spirit, the Spirit is referred to as a man. The God of the Bible is a male.
C.LeClair Dumas  - That guy  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:54 am
@ Mark Buller

The subject of the essay is "EFFEMINATE" worship not feminine worship, those would be too different things. Tip: Careful reading saves you from making such assumptions.
Michael Bull  - Uniting heaven and earth  Monday, April 16, 2012 8:33 pm
We worship in the Holy Place. Under the Old Covenant, the Sanctuary wasn't safe. Adam had to continually shed and offer blood to deal with the Accuser. Christ, as Adam, made the Sanctuary safe for Eve, so women are now included in worship.

Man and woman stand together before God, BUT they have different stations. Adam links the Holy to the Most Holy, and Eve links the Holy to the outer courts. Adam images Christ; Eve images the nations.
Jacob Oblak  - Misogyny  Monday, April 16, 2012 9:01 pm
I can't believe the misogyny rampant throughout this essay. Essentially he equates effeminate with sinful, which is the very definition of hating women. One other thought: I loved the last one (#11): 'if you're offended, you're effeminate.' Yeah. Way to emotionally manipulate someone into agreeing regardless of reason and logic.
David Gray  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:34 am
"Essentially he equates effeminate with sinful"

Effeminacy is sinful. Femininity is not. If you can't tell the difference you're likely infected.
Ian  - You mean God isn't my girlfriend?  Monday, April 16, 2012 9:51 pm
I have about had it with sappy modern praise music. As much as I love the people in my church body and think it is mostly a pretty healthy place, I must admit to being tempted to belt out Psalm 83 (the whole thing, of course) at the top of my lungs during the quietest part of one of those sappy choruses (I'm trying to name one, but they all must be sufficiently mind-numbing that I can't recall what any of them are called at the moment).
Eric F. Langborgh  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:43 am
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
~1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Eric F. Langborgh  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:51 am
From Webster's:

effeminate |iˈfemənət|
adjective
(of a man) having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; unmanly.
DERIVATIVES
effeminacy |iˈfemənəsē|noun,
effeminately adverb
ORIGIN late Middle English: from Latin effeminatus, past participle of effeminare ‘make feminine,’ from ex- (expressing a change of state) + femina ‘woman.’
Example by SYNONYM: an effeminate bartender: womanish, effete, foppish, unmanly, feminine; informal camp, campy, flaming. ANTONYMS manly.
Steven Wedgeworth  - FYI  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:38 am
Eric,

In that passage, the word "effeminate" is an English euphemism for catamites.
Roger Ball  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:48 am
I'm lovin number 4. You must have visited my church at some time or another. Yeaah Baby!!
C.LeClair Dumas  - Mmmmm  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:54 am
@ Mark Buller

The subject of the essay is "EFFEMINATE" worship not feminine worship, those would be too different things. Tip: Careful reading saves you from making such assumptions.
Sergius Martin-George  - "guarded and protected" from WHAT?  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:32 am
I suspect I'm not the only one who is still unclear on this nebulous threat to worshipping women.

Rev. Wilson: You write, "To attack effeminacy is not to attack women -- it is to attack that which cannot guard and protect the women."

Protect them from WHAT?

In an earlier comment, I asked you about your implication that women need to be made to "feel safe," presumably because they do not feel safe under prevailing conditions. I still haven't seen a clarification on that item.

So what is this nebulous, unnamed threat to female worshippers? And why are male worshippers immuned to this same threat?

Thanks.
Elaine  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:38 pm
Exactly. I don't need a man to protect me from anything, thank you very much. I'm quite capable and rely on the Lord for His protection from evil and sin.
Jody Killingsworth  - Really?  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:33 pm
Really? Including the man Christ Jesus who protects you from the wrath of God? And what about those men through whom God gave you His Word? Nearly all of them sacrificed their lives so you might come to know Christ and be rescued from Satan's power. And what about your forefathers in the faith who fought for the purity of the Gospel? No need for the work of Athanasius? Tyndale? Luther? And what about your pastor (assuming you have one)? No need of his protection? Even though he's been charged with the responsibility to shepherd for your soul as a faithful under-shepherd of Christ? What about your earthly father? Haven't needed him? The truth is it's impossible to know God at all independent of protecting work of countless men.

Only Christ is a perfect man. The rest are sinners. The fact that some men sin in heinous ways, preying on the helpless, does not negate God's goodness to us in ordering the world in such a way as to make men indispensable to our spiritual and physical well being.
Elaine  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:07 pm
Since when is worshiping the Lord a war...? I go to church to glorify Him, not to kill people.
Jody Killingsworth  - Correction...  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:01 pm
Not people, Elaine, not flesh and blood, but we war against spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places (Eph 6:12); against speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God (2Cor 10:5); and against our own sinful desires (Gal 5:17).
Tammy Burns  Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:45 pm
I would feel more protected if the elders exercised church discipline. If someone wrongs you need to have elders who will stand up for the victim. We think nothing of the secular world we having judges.

But I do get concerned in our violent culture that some men don't think Jesus is being masculine when He talks about peace. The Amish men are some of the most masculine men because they spend lots of time raising their teenage sons to be men. Yet they are very peaceful.
Will S  Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:24 am
Tammy, I think it depends on the type of peace that you are preaching. As Christians, we certainly should not be in the business of advocating violence or hot headed saber rattling. Sometimes the martyr who willingly lays down his life is the most manly of us all.

But there is a battle going on. There is a spiritual battle and the forces of evil are aligned against us. That comes from pure demonic attacks, from political parties, from cultural institutions, from the liberal advocates in church leadership, and from a general popular zeitgeist. To 'play the man' we need to be willing to acknowledge this battle and be willing to fight it at all fronts. To deny that the battle is there (or to declare peace with such enemies) is not a manly thing to do at all.
Tammy Burns  Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:47 am
I agree Will there is a spiritual battle. I like your comment about laying down your life, being manly. I live where there is a lot of military and they make fun of Jimmy Carter for not going to war.

The Amish seem to be battling the culture through church discipline. They have also gone to court to fight the government for what they believe. But they don't do much to change the laws for everyone.
Valerie (Kyriosity)  Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:10 pm
I posted the following on my blog:

1 Samuel 2 was where my bookmark was this morning. As I read Hannah’s song of thanksgiving, I thought of the hymns of other women in the Bible: Miriam, Deborah, and Mary. (Did I miss any?) So I read them all and jotted down these reflections (edited for public consumption):

* Exodus 15:21 – Miriam’s brief hymn is sung in response to Moses’ longer song. Her song is responsive, not initiative. The occasion was not formal worship, in which case she wouldn’t have been soloing at all. She sings of Yahweh’s violent triumph over the chariots of Egypt.

* Judges 5 — Deborah and Barak’s song is, again, not in the context of worship, but public celebration. Deborah does not lead out on her own, even despite Barak’s less-than-exemplary manliness in the previous chapter. She sings of Yahweh’s marching, which shook the earth. She sings of His fighting the enemies of His people. She rejoices in the death of His enemies.

* 1 Samuel 2:1-10 — Hannah’s song is a personal exultation of Yahweh. She speaks boldly against her enemies because she has Yahweh’s salvation to rejoice in. She rejoices in Yahweh’s triumphs over His enemies by which He delivers His people and she draws strength and courage from that. In Hannah’s case the enemy wasn’t a mighty army, but a petty personal adversary, but she speaks in strong military terms of how Yahweh put Peninnah in her place. She rejoices that God is the Judge of the whole earth.

* Luke 1: 46-45 – Mary, again in a private context, also rejoices in God as Savior, rejoicing in His triumph and judgment.

That gives us a few ideas of what feminine worship should look like:

* It doesn’t barge ahead of male leadership.

* It rejoices in God’s judgment, even when it’s violent.

* It is safe and secure in the knowledge of his powerful salvation.

So when wise men write against effeminate worship, they aren’t bashing women at all, because effeminate worship is nothing like feminine worship. Effeminate worship denies male leadership, downplays God’s judgment, and leaves women insecure under the ill-conceived notion that it’s better if both God and men are too nicey-nice to defend or protect them.
Rick Davis  - re:  Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:54 am
Valerie (Kyriosity) wrote:
I posted the following on my blog:
So when wise men write against effeminate worship, they aren’t bashing women at all, because effeminate worship is nothing like feminine worship. Effeminate worship denies male leadership, downplays God’s judgment, and leaves women insecure under the ill-conceived notion that it’s better if both God and men are too nicey-nice to defend or protect them.


Wow. That last paragraph about sums up the issue about up as well as I've ever seen.
Tammy Burns  Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:44 pm
In the old testament God did have wars for the nation of Israel. But worship now is not about war. Spiritual battles yes. Men in other cultures cant understand Americans thirst for violence.

If anyone in the church, male or female, has been mistreated by another, the elders are to discipline.

Miguel  - begging the quesiton?  Sunday, April 22, 2012 9:14 pm
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't point #11 kind of a circular logic? Doesn't it in essence say, "If you disagree with me you are proving my point?"

...and somebody help me out with this distinction between "effeminate" and "feminine." I guess I'm just infected or something. But if effeminate just means womanly traits in a man (as opposed to in a women where they belong), then isn't this article just equating all these negative tendencies with characteristics that belong to women?

I could sympathize more with all these points if gender were removed from the equation and "effeminate" were replaced with "wimpy" or "cowardly." Correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems like what is truly meant, only it seems women must be accused of such in the process.
Valerie (Kyriosity)  Monday, April 23, 2012 3:58 pm
Miguel, I think rather that being touchy and easily offended counts as its own criterion. Plus it was funny.