Banner
Westminster Fifteen: Of Repentance Unto Life PDF Print E-mail
Theology - Notes on Westminster
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Thursday, 12 October 2006 10:32

1. Repentance unto life is an evangelical grace (Zech 12:10; Acts 11:18), the doctrine whereof is to be preached by every minister of the Gospel, as well as that of faith in Christ (Luke 24:47; Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21).

Ministers of Christ are not just to preach faith in Christ; they must also preach repentance unto life. But they are not only to preach repentance, but they are to declare it as an evangelical grace. That is, repentance is a gift from God. God demands nothing of sinners in salvation which He does not also offer, in the preaching of the Word, as a free gift.

2. By it, a sinner, out of the sight and sense not only of the danger, but also of the filthiness and odiousness of his sins, as contrary to the holy nature, and righteous law of God; and upon the apprehension of His mercy in Christ to such as are penitent, so grieves for, and hates his sins, as to turn from them all unto God (Ezek. 18:30–31; 36:31; Isa. 30:22; Ps. 51:4; Jer. 31:18–19; Joel 2:12–13; Amos 5:15; Ps. 119:128; 2 Cor. 7;11), purposing and endeavouring to walk with Him in all the ways of His commandments (Ps. 119:6, 59, 106; Luke 1:6; 2 Ki. 23:25).

The sinner begins in a state of moral stupidity. He does not see the danger of his sins, and he does not see the filthiness of them. He does not do so because he does not connect his behavior to the holy nature of God, as being inconsistent with who God is and what God has said. Nor does he see and understand how God would be delighted to show him mercy if in a state of penitence. If he were to see this, he would grieve for his sins and hate them, and turn away from them to God. If brought to this state of repentance, he would turn to God with the full intent of walking with Him through all his days, following all His laws.

3. Although repentance be not to be rested in, as any satisfaction for sin, or any cause of the pardon thereof (Ezek. 36:31–32; 16:61–63), which is the act of God’s free grace in Christ (Hos. 14:2, 4; Rom. 3:24; Eph. 1:7); yet it is of such necessity to all sinners, that none may expect pardon without it (Luke 13:3, 5; Acts 17:30–31).

Repentance is necessary to salvation but must never be thought of as the cause of it. Apples are necessary to apple trees, but apples never caused anything to become an apple tree. No man was ever saved apart from repentance, but repentance is not the reason God saves him—it is one of the instruments of salvation. The so-called "Lordship" controversy in fundamentalist circles is a result of not understanding this truth. If a man must repent in order to be saved, and if repentance is not an evangelical gift, then it does follow that to demand repentance is to demand salvation by works. But the problem is in the premises. Repentance is a gift of God.

4. As there is no sin so small, but it deserves damnation (Rom. 6:23; 5:12; Matt. 12:36); so there is no sin so great, that it can bring damnation upon those who truly repent (Isa. 55:7; Rom. 8:1; Isa. 1:16, 18).

A tiny sin is worthy to damn a man. And by the same token, no sin is so great as to exclude a man from God's presence if there is true repentance. God can and does save the greatest of sinners.

5. Men ought not to content themselves with a general repentance, but it is every man’s duty to endeavour to repent of his particular sins, particularly (Ps. 19:13; Luke 19:8; 1 Tim. 1:13, 15).

While there is no obligation to name every particular sin ever committed (which cannot be done), for the sake of simple honesty, it is important for a man to name particular sins as he comes in repentance to God. If he does not, then the possibility is great that his repentance is for sins defined according to his own lights, and not according to the Word. The duty is not to list every sin, but to list sins in truth, in a manner that demonstrates that we know what we are doing.

6. As every man is bound to make private confession of his sins to God, praying for the pardon thereof (Ps. 51:4–5, 7, 9, 14; Ps. 32:5–6); upon which, and the forsaking of them, he shall find mercy (Prov. 28:13; 1 John 1:9); so, he that scandalizeth his brother, or the Church of Christ, ought to be willing, by a private or public confession, and sorrow for his sin, to declare his repentance to those that are offended (James 5:16; Luke 17:3–4; Josh. 7:19; Ps 51), who are thereupon to be reconciled to him, and in love to receive him (2 Cor. 2:8).

Repentance for sin ought to be as public as the sin was, or in some measure commensurate with it. In other words, the duty of repentance brings with it the duty of restitution, whether done publicly or privately as the case may require. When this is done, the sinner is to be received back into fellowship in love.



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
Last Updated on Thursday, 12 October 2006 10:32
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
John Barry  Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:03 pm
Douglas, You say, "Repentance is a gift of God."

One meaning of "gift" is "something bestowed or acquired without any particular effort by the recipient or without its being earned." (Dictionary.com)

Is repentance a gift in this sense? Or do you mean that the *ability* or *opportunity* to repent is granted or given by God? Or something else?

In other words, what *is* the repentance that is given, and in what sense is it given?

Douglas Wilson  Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:21 pm
John, I mean the repentance itself. Scripture never calls "opportunity to repent" repentance. And in a number of places it says that God gives repentance. God commands us to turn back to Him, and He gives us obedience.
John Barry  Thursday, October 12, 2006 2:41 pm
Douglas, You say that God commands us to turn back to Him, and gives us obedience (or the turning back). I can't conceive how someone (even God) can give someone else an *action*. Can you illustrate this with an example that I might be able to grasp?
Douglas Wilson  Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:16 pm
Sure. Timothy is told to meekly instruct those who oppose themselves to him, in the hope that God would give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth (2 Tim. 2:25).
Kyle S.  Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:36 pm
Just in case John meant he'd like an example that would show how this generally works: God, through the Holy Spirit, provides for someone all the conditions sufficient to motivate, and bring about, a state of mind of repentance in him (including the relevant bits of knowledge). This motivates obedience. So it happens through the internal instigation of the Holy Spirit. This seems to be the point of the commentary on 2.
John Barry  Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:42 pm
Douglas, I am familiar with the scriptures that refer to God "giving repentance" (see also Acts 5:31, 11:18). I understand these texts to mean that God opens the way for repentance, makes provision for repentance, gives the *opportunity* or *ability* to repent. But you maintain that God gives repentance itself, that He gives "turning back", or "changing mind". These are actions. Because I am unable to conceive how an action can be given or received, I asked you to illustrate this. Perhaps, for example, you could explain how you gave me "asking questions" by your post above? Care to take another stab at it?
John Barry  Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:45 pm
Douglas, Your insistence that God gives repentance itself seems to give rise to unnecessary problems in light of the numerous commands to repent and texts such as the following:

Romans 2:4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?

2 Corinthians 7:10 For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of….

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

Rev 2:21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.

I’m curious why you hold on to your assertion that God gives repentance, in the sense that He gives someone the action of changing one’s mind. Is this a necessary piece to your theological puzzle?

John Barry  Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:55 pm
Kyle S., What you describe is not my understanding of what Douglas asserts. You refer to God's making provision for repentance and motivating obedience. These agree with the sense of Scripture and I am able to understand them (to a degree). But Douglas asserts that "giving repentance" is not giving the "opportunity" to repent, but giving repentance itself--"turning back" or "changing mind"--which is an *action*. I am unable to grasp how an action may be given or received. If you are able to do this, help me out.
Bill Harris  Friday, October 13, 2006 1:10 am
John Barry, I will atempt to explain what I think Doug means by granting repentance. God commanded Lot & his family to leave, (repent if you will), Sodom, commanding them not to look back. As long as they "repented" they were able to flee. When his wife turned back she was turned into a pillar of salt.Therefore unable to repent, (her actions were stopped) anymore.
Douglas Wilson  Friday, October 13, 2006 1:31 am
John, the fact that God gives "actions" is something that all Christians affirm, whether they can conceive it or not. Writing the book of Romans was an action, was it not? And whose words are they? I would say they are fully Paul's words (Paul's action of writing, his personality fully engaged), and fully God's words (given to Paul, and not by simple dictation either). The book was given by God (God's action) and written by Paul (Paul's action), such that the resultant book can be simultaneously called the Word of God, and a letter of Paul. Though I suspect your rationalistic bias will not go along with me in this, I will nonetheless say, ta da!
Xon Hostetter  Friday, October 13, 2006 1:32 am
John, the fact that Doug Wilson can't give you an action like "asking questions" has nothing to do with what God can do. God is omnipotent, after all, and it is frankly hard to believe that your mind has that much trouble grasping the idea that God can cause people to do things He wants them to do.



This isn't a logical puzzle here. And your interpretation that "giving repentance" actually means "opening the way" for repentance seems far more puzzling to me than the claim that God can cause people to act in accordance with His plan for them. (I "gave" my nephew an XBox, which actually means that I "prepared the way" for him to have an Xbox? Huh?)



As to the other passages you quote, I don't see how these in any way contradict Pastor Wilson's assertion that God gives some people repentance (and, by implication, does not give this gift to others). There is simply no contradiction or "difficulty" here, that I can see, unless perhaps you are assuming a bunch of things about "free will" and such that aren't in the Biblical texts. Perhaps you can explain more precisely what you think the difficulty is with these passages you cited in light of the Reformed (Douglas's) view?
John Barry  Friday, October 13, 2006 1:52 am
Xon, I understand what you mean when you say that you gave your nephew an XBox. I have an idea what an XBox is. Douglas's assertion is not analogous to this. It is analogous to your giving your son "playing with an XBox". It is an *action*--changing of one's mind--that Douglas asserts God gives. This I am unable to understand at all.
John Barry  Friday, October 13, 2006 2:15 am
Douglas, I appreciate your using the phrase "rationalistic bias" instead of "rationalism". Do I detect a softening here? I long for the day when you use my name and something like, "sound use of God-given reason" in the same sentence.

You say, "God gives "actions" is something that all Christians affirm, whether they can conceive it or not." Can you give me an example of something you affirm and of which you have absolutely no conception?

I think your example of Paul writing Romans is a good one. The Holy Spirit inspires, Paul writes. The Spirit does one thing, Paul does another. This is analogous to the Holy Spirit working on the sinner by various means, in response to which work the sinner repents. The Spirit "gives" one thing, the sinner "gives" another. If this is what you mean by God "giving repentance", then we are in agreement, and have been all along.

Dan Sack  Friday, October 13, 2006 2:19 am
Mr. Barry, to continue with Dictionary.com usage... I noticed that "repent" and "confess" have different definitions, and that it seems like you are talking more about confession than repentance, as confession is more of a specific action, and repentance is more of an attitude or state-of-mind. So, maybe God gives repentance, not confession?
Xon Hostetter  Friday, October 13, 2006 2:39 am
John, you've misunderstood my usage of the XBox analogy. That was a direct challenge to your interpretation of what "gives" means. It has nothing to do with the question of whether it makes sense to give an "action" or not.



That question, again, is simply not puzzling to me. God is, you know, God. If God wants me to jump and down in place right now, He could cause me to do so, and He could do so in a large (infinite?) variety of ways, but the end result would be that here I am, jumpin up and down in place. Do you deny that God can do this sort of thing?



Attributing such a denial to a "sound use of God-given reason" would be horribly confused, seeing as how the vast majority of Christians throughout the history of the Church have not had any trouble thinking of God as being able to cause people to do what He wants them to do. Not even the "open theists" challenge this notion, in particular specific cases. They question the Calvinistic notion that God does this all the time with every human action, but they certainly recognize that an omnipotent God can intervene in human life in such a way that causes particular human actions in accordance with His plan. How could this not be so? What is so hard about having a "conception" of this sort of thing happening? What background assumptions are supporting your skepticism here?

John Barry  Friday, October 13, 2006 3:21 am
Xon, I agree that God can *make* you jump. I don't understand how he can "give you jumping". As you say, He can make you jump in a large (infinite?) variety of ways. But *you* jump. God doesn't "give you jumping". He may do all manner of other things to get you to jump. But *you* jump (or not, as you will).

When I proposed above my understanding that "giving repentance" might mean "giving the opportunity to repent", Douglas said that he meant the repentance itself. I took him to mean the action of repenting resulting in repentance. (How else does one have repentance other than by repenting?) So Douglas's (at least, initial) assertion was that God doesn't give or do other things to *get us* to repent--He gives repenting--or changing the mind--itself. It was this that I asked Douglas to explain.

John Barry  Friday, October 13, 2006 3:34 am
Xon, You asked me to explain more precisely what I think the difficulty is with the passages I cited in light of the Reformed (Douglas's) view.

One example: Douglas says that giving repentance does not mean giving the opportunity to repent. But In Rev 2:21 (cited above) Jesus gives Jezebel space (or time) to repent, but she refuses to repent. If giving space or time to repent is not giving opportunity to repent, then what is it?

Xon Hostetter  Friday, October 13, 2006 3:53 am
John, but this is not an either/or. God saying that he gives someone "space" to repent is not in mutual contradiction with God also saying that when people do repent, it's because He caused them to do so. The two things simply are not contradictory, on their face.



"I agree that God can *make* you jump. I don't understand how he can "give you jumping"."



By making you jump. If God wants me to jump, and so He makes me jump, and then He says that He "gave" it to me that I should be a jumper, what is so hard to understand about that?
John Barry  Friday, October 13, 2006 9:35 am
Xon, You missed my point when I explained the problem with Rev. 2:21 and Douglas's view. Perhaps because I missed it first. Although I think one would agree that giving space to repent and opportunity to repent are one and the same, one might use this verse to show that giving opportunity to repent and giving repentance are not the same, since Jezebel was given opportunity to repent, but she was presumably not given repentance itself (since she didn't repent). Did you follow that?

Anyway, this text and 2 Pet 3:9 careen wildly into the wall of God's before the foundation of the world, immutable, exhaustive decree of all that comes to pass. If God had immutably decreed that Jezebel not repent, then in what meaningful sense did Jesus give her time to repent? Assuming Jesus knew of the decree, this would seem to make Jesus' statement disingenuous at best. And if God had immutably decreed that He give repentance solely to the elect, then in what meaningful sense does He will that all come to repentance? (I know there is nothing original in these questions).

I asked Douglas to explain how God gives an action--changing the mind. You now speak of God making someone repent. Do you understand God giving repentance to someone and God making someone repent to be the same?

John Barry  Friday, October 13, 2006 9:36 am
That's what I get from trying out the italic code. Oh well.
Xon Hostetter  Sunday, October 15, 2006 5:34 am
John, yes, I understand them to be the same. If God gives "an action" to somebody, it means that God decreed that that person should perform the action in question, and all that God decrees comes to pass.



On the other hand, there are other actions which God commands us to do, which we are morally responsible to do, and which God gives us ample opportunity to do (i.e., we could do them if we wanted to), but which we nonetheless fail to do. This is because God did not decree in His sovereign all-powerful way that we should do those things.



"if God had immutably decreed that He give repentance solely to the elect, then in what meaningful sense does He will that all come to repentance?"



This is a mystery, like the Trinity, but it is clearly taught in Scripture. God decrees who does what, but we are also responsible for what we do. And God sincerely "interacts" with us as far as our behavior is concerned--i.e. He commands us, forbids us, pleads with us, punishes us, rewards us, etc. God commands us to repent, and at the same time He decrees who actually obeys that command and who doesn't.



The Scriptures are clear on these points, but they're not clear (silent, actually) as to how exactly they all fit together in a way that satisfies philosophers. I'm a philosopher, so I know. :-)
John Barry  Sunday, October 15, 2006 12:25 pm
Xon, It looks like I inadvertently infected your post as well. (cont.)
John Barry  Sunday, October 15, 2006 12:25 pm
Is this how I end the italics?
John Barry  Sunday, October 15, 2006 12:26 pm
Apparently not.
David C. Moody  Sunday, October 15, 2006 4:07 pm
Since you obviously know what to do to start italics, all you need to do to end the italics is "<" then "/" then "I" then ">". It's the same thing as the original italics marker, but with that additional slash before the "I".
David C. Moody  Sunday, October 15, 2006 4:08 pm
Well, it works for bold, but not for italics?
John Barry  Sunday, October 15, 2006 9:33 pm
John Barry  Sunday, October 15, 2006 9:33 pm
Test
John Barry  Sunday, October 15, 2006 9:35 pm
Thanks, David.