Banner
Guys On Little Motorcycles PDF Print E-mail
Culture and Politics - Politics
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Tuesday, 19 April 2011 06:36

The clownish foray of Donald Trump into presidential politics reveals some things to us. First, as with so many other things, giraffes, for example, it teaches us that God has a sense of humor. Second, it illustrates the dearth of real leadership available to the Republican party. Third, it shows us how respectability squelches don't really work. Each one in turn then.

On the sense of humor thing, not much needs to be said. In the grand parade of human politics, with the marching band, and the military units, and the cheerleading squads, we still find ourselves longing to see those guys on the little motorcycles.

The second point is more serious. If the Republican field were crowded shoulder to shoulder with statesmen, this kind of thing couldn't happen. A buffoon can only be taken seriously when all the serious people are not being taken seriously. Charles Krauthammer has called Trump the Al Sharpton of the right, and there is something to this. But I think the effect is actually more like what it would be if Jon Stewart or Steven Colbert were to run for office, with the schtick going. Comedians can say things, and raise issues, that other candidates cannot. And although Trump is not a comedian, I think being a parody of oneself comes pretty close.

And I begin my last point with a qualification. I say nothing here about the advisability or truthfulness of any particular position, but rather just pointing out how, when the respectability police shut down intelligent discussion of hot issues, they only succeed in getting fruitcake discussion of them. Take a page from the gun rights advocates. When controversial opinions are outlawed, only outlaws will have controversial opinions. Simply tag it as risible, and you don't have to talk about it -- truther, birther, etc.

I am talking here about Trump's stated desire to take all Iraq's oil, and I believe he has now added Libya to the list. I am also pointing to his robust embrace of the birther question. When this kind of thing happens, and the unapologetic person concerned shoots up in the polls, this should be an indication to everyone that he is tapping into a sentiment that everybody thought was successfully driven away . . . when it wasn't. Horace once said you can drive nature out with a pitchfork, but she keeps on coming back. The same thing goes for questions settled by fiat instead of answers. Like I said, I am not saying anything about the answers to such questions. I am just pointing out how ludicrous questions can get traction.

 

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Melody  Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:07 am
The Republican Party leadership is like the Evangelical Church. They are convinced that what they know to be true really isn't the "good news" and therefore must be kept under wraps and secretly sprung on someone after they join - and then they will understand. :roll:
Michael Buschbacher  Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:19 am
>>Horace once said you can drive nature out with a pitchfork, but she keeps on coming back.

I always thought it was Tom Waits who said that :)
JP1  Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: "respectability police" shutting off debate, leading to only nuts thus debating said topics(Ventura has a new book out as case in point)....while this is true, the reason it happens is a good one, IMO. Should leadership spend precious, limited time debating Jesse Ventura, Lew Rockwell, Michael Moore and company....or devout that time and energy against Obama and the Dems agenda? Plus keep in mind, Republicans are by default playing at a huge disadvantage given the Media's leanings and power in setting the dialogue.
Tim  Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:43 pm
Did I speed-read past something? How is the question of Obama's birthplace a "ludicrous" question?
Gianni  Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:23 am

Tim, while traveling approximately at your same speed I received the same impression, and I also thought that Pastor Wilson had changed his view on this.

But I think a careful reading, along with some knowledge of what Wilson has said in the past, indicates that he means that the birther question is an example of a question which is tagged as ludicrous in hope it goes away, but doesn't, as shown by the fact that "the unapologetic person concerned shoots up in the polls" as soon as he digs it out. My two cents.

JP1  Wednesday, April 20, 2011 4:21 am
Trump isn't shooting up only because of Birther thing, its the in general Jacksonian combativeness and aggression he's displaying, while being a national "Brand Name" associated with success. He's also not a politician which is also helping.
Douglas Wilson  Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:59 am
Tim, Gianni read me right.
Joseph Hession  - b.t.w...  Wednesday, April 20, 2011 6:06 am
b.t.w...for those who care, the question is not where he was born, but rather, why the Founders' definition of "Natural Born Citizen" is being ignored. The Founders having relied on Vattel's Law of Nations when defining "Natural Born Citizen" expressly excludes a child if both parents are not American citizens. Forget the place of birth. Why did Congress see fit to deem the son of a British Citizen (Kenyan Papa) to be "Natural Born" when, best case, he is merely "Naturalized."

I agree that Trump is only on this particular bandwagon because it's politically expedient. And if he really thinks that the majority of hardcore birthers are going to vote for the next president based on the illegitimizing the current one, then he is the clown on a little motorcycle that you're looking for. :D
Robert Seward  Thursday, April 21, 2011 6:09 am
This is nothing to do with the Founders. It has everything to do with the Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment, post CW, grants citizenship by birth to anyone that is subject to the jurisdiction thereof. The supreme Court deems that clause to exclude children of diplomats. Everyone else, from child of illegal alien you the President of the United States who is born here is a citizen. Period.