Banner
Mosquitos and HIV PDF Print E-mail
Familial - Retractions
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Tuesday, 13 January 2009 00:52

In my recent book God Is, in the course of responding to a charge that non-acceptance of the HIV causation of AIDS amounted to malevolence or stupidity or both, I used the illustration of a latex condom stopping an HIV virus being like trying to stop a mosquito with a chain link fence (given the size of the virus and the size of the condom's "mesh"). I also recall using that illustration many years ago somewhere in Credenda also.

In a recent correspondence with a UK med student, he used an illustration that was more to the point. He said it was more like trying to stop malaria with mosquito netting. The mosquitos aren't malaria, but they are the carriers, and stopping the carrier is all that is necessary. The mosquito netting doesn't have to be fine enough to catch the malarial infecting agent directly, which is not how the infection comes anyway. In a comparable way, the latex condom doesn't have to stop the HIV virus directly; it is sufficient to stop the carrier. I will adjust any future use of this illustration accordingly, and I stand corrected.



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 00:52
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Chris Witmer  Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:37 am
I know this is off topic, but I wonder what your UK med student correspondent might have to say about passionate kissing and other types of sexual contact involving the *mouth* as a vehicle for HIV transmission. And, speaking of mosquitoes, what about biting insects and HIV?


I have found the debates (such as they are) over whether AIDS is caused by HIV to be fascinating. I tend to be attracted to the position of the officially heterodox on this issue, i.e., that AIDS is not caused by HIV, but then again I don't have much in the way of credentials for evaluating the evidence on the two sides.

Doc  Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:13 am
I am not an HIV researcher, nor do I directly review such research. As a family physician, I am at the mercy of the presumed experts in the field. Having said that, I don't really have much doubt that AIDS is caused by the HIV virus. I don't blame folks for their doubts, however. The discipline of medicine, having slipped the leash of its rightful queen theology, like all the other academic disciplines, is now in the hands of those who think they're the accidental byproducts of a cosmic burp some umpty-billion years ago. Some idiocies (like claiming that it's unethical to refuse to perform or refer for an abortion) are bound to occur.
lewsta  Wednesday, January 14, 2009 5:33 pm
So, what does your UK medic chap claim IS the "vector" for AIDS? I have long understood the virus can roam freely within the seminal fluid, this the chain link fence analogy would seem accurate. I have also long understod that the HIV IS the cause of AIDS, and that it CAN, and often IS, transmitted from carrier to new victom despite the use of condoms. And such spreading of the disease is not through other "means of contact", as suggested above, but by directly passing through a condom during sexual intercourse. But maybe the research I've heretofore seen is bogus? In DOES seem substantiated, at least anecdotally, that AIDS is often spread despite the use of condoms. Hmm.. maybe there IS something to the command of our Maker to limit sexual contact to your spouse, ONLY and ALWAYS. Just think.. if EVERYONE on the planet would do this one thing, AIDS would be almost nonexistent within one generation, and at almost NO expense. What a concept, eh? (but don't tell PP I said this.... they shouldn't like it one bit)