Banner
Just Call Me Old-Fashioned PDF Print E-mail
Money, Love, Desire - The Good of Affluence
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 14:51

This coming Thursday, Jim Wallis and Al Mohler will be debating the question of social justice and the mission of the church (HT: Justin Taylor). Click here for more. The question before the house will be this: "Is Social Justice an Essential Part of the Mission of the Church?" Wallis will be arguing the affirmative and Mohler the negative.

If you listen to the debate, be sure to keep track of two distinct questions. One is what constitutes the essence of the church's mission, and whether social justice as biblically defined, is part of that essential mission. But a completely separate question is whether Jim Wallis has any idea of biblical social justice is, and whether what he is proposing under the heading of social justice is actually, when defined by the Bible, social injustice.

So whatever we decide on the former question, surely all Christians should be able to agree that the spreading of social injustice is not part of the church's mission. That should be easy, right? But the policies advocated by Wallis are precisely that -- the spreading of injustice and, when they conk out because of a lack of funding, to subsidize them so that the injustice goes even further.

From this distance, I would not dream of judging Wallis' motives. I couldn't possibly know if his heart hates poor people. But the part of his brain that proposes policies sure hates them. So, call me old-fashioned if you like -- I don't believe that hating poor people is an essential part of the church's mission.



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Dan Phillips (Pyromaniacs)  - Yeah boy  Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:31 pm
"Social justice"? Isn't that favoring death penalty and restitution and wealth creation and generosity, and opposing butchering kids for being inconvenient or imperfect?

I'm all for it!
Robert Seward  Tuesday, October 25, 2011 8:17 pm
Defining what is meant my social justice has to be first
TBush  - One would think so  Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:03 am
Yeah- you'd think that ending abortion on demand would AT LEAST be on the radar of the 'socially-conscious' Christian left.

Sadly it's waaaaay down on the list of priorities, methinketh...
elisabeth thunderberry  - good post:)  Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6:00 am
I don't believe that hating poor people is an essential part of the church's mission.
Matt Weber  Wednesday, October 26, 2011 7:17 am
I agree with Robert. Without a working definition of 'social justice' accepted by both parties, they're just going to be talking past each other.