Banner
No Middle Ground PDF Print E-mail
Money, Love, Desire - Violence and the Trinity
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Monday, 19 January 2009 01:48

If we believe in the Bible, we believe in the Christian future. This means that the salt is not seasoning to no effect, and that the light is not shining to no effect. The labor we put forth to make the world a better place is not labor wasted (1 Cor. 15:58). Moreover, if we understand how Christ's kingdom is one that will increase everlastingly (Is. 9:7), we understand that the lack of waste is not promised because we will be rewarded in another dimension somewhere for work done here, but rather that the work we do here to till the ground for the planting of Christ's wheat will result in a harvest here. What we do in the name of Jesus matters, and it matters here.

The salt and light is designed to get into everything, transforming it. The temptation to live in "separated communities," while understandable, is still a temptation. How does the Word spread? The Word spreads as those who believe it and talk about it spread (Acts 8:4). Now as we are scattered all over tarnation, talking about Jesus, where is it appropriate to go?

Geographically, it is appropriate to go anywhere because we were told to preach the gospel to every creature (Mark 16:15). We are not limited in that way -- it can be Asia, Australia, or North Dakota. The Lord Jesus is the promised life of the whole world.

But when we get there, we discover that we will have to make a living, provide for our families, and live a quiet and peaceable life (1 Thess. 4:11-12). So what professions may we scatter into? Or, to put it a bit stronger, what professions may we scatter into without incurring the just censure of the church?

Nobody believes that the Christian mission means that we should send our daughters into prostitution in order to be salt and light there, gradually transforming what has unfortunately become kind of a tawdry business. Nobody thinks that if we get enough of our young people selling cocaine, we can make it into a Christian affair. If anybody were foolish enough to actually do that, a faithful church would respond to it with church discipline. Now, is joining the army or navy in this same category, or is it in a different one?

If it is in the same category, then the church must authoritatively pronounce against it, and enforce her strictures. If it is not, then the pacifist case is entirely wrong, and there is no room left for a sympathetic quasi-pacifism.

A quick side note: this is a separate question entirely than whether or not it is appropriate to join that army over there. That is a question raised by just war theory, and not by pacifism. A man can believe it is appropriate to become a realtor, and yet avoid working for a particular realty business because of their dishonest business practices. That is a separate question. A just war theorist is not one who can justify any war. Just war theory assumes that many (if not most) wars are to be be rejected.

This issue is like falling out of the sky onto a steep roof -- you have to roll down one side or the other. If it is lawful for a Christian man to go into military service, then salt and light travels there, and has its influence there, in an analagous way to what it does in architecture, theater, education, and construction. If it is not lawful, then Christians should respond to an announcement that a young man has just joined the Marines with the same horror that we would show when the youngest daughter declares that she has a job as a stripper.

Pacifists, to their credit, at least as far as consistency requires, congregate in anabaptist communities where this is done, and this attitude cultivated. But quasi-pacifists just raise troubling questions, enough to create a deep sense of unease and perhaps false guilt, but not so much that anybody ever has to act on the basis of what they believe.

When I counsel young men who are going into the military, I talk to them about the challenges they will face, and how they must have thought through the issues so that they will not compromise their Christian convictions. Those situations, which will arise, must not catch them by surprise. But this is the same attitude that Christians must have going into every line of work. For the rest, we must do our jobs heartily, as unto the Lord.



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
Last Updated on Monday, 19 January 2009 01:48
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Doc  Monday, January 19, 2009 5:10 am
OK, then, I'll bite, being the father of 4, 3 of them boys from 15-20 yrs old, at least one of them seriously considering a military career (as a marine recon type no less) in the US (because he perceives it as quite possibly being his duty to do so): is it lawful to join ANY military that is not in service to an explicitly Christian state, other issues aside? And, if it is, considering the current state of the US, its military, its leadership, etc, is it lawful to join the US military?
Reagan Schaupp  Monday, January 19, 2009 11:50 am

Butbutbut...Doc. Asking that is exactly the same as asking:



Is is lawful to join ANY profession that is not in service to an explicitly Christian leadership?



You name the profession. Except for ministerial and some charity work, one will face the identical question in any--any!--other calling. If the answer in the military case is "no," because the chain of command isn't explicitly Christian, then we must realize the answer in every other case is "no." Patent nonsense, it seems to me.
Doc  Monday, January 19, 2009 2:26 pm
I think I understand your point, and it's well taken, but while you may be correct in principle, DW pointed out that a decision to join THAT military over there is to be guided by JW principles (I think that's what he meant); considering what seems to me to be the widely held opinion here that no military action undertaken by the US since the Civil War (and possibly before that) has passed the JW test, and none in the near future is likely to, where does that leave a young man considering, e.g., Naval ROTC?
Eric Stampher  Monday, January 19, 2009 5:22 pm
Beg to differ on your inferences drawn from I Cor & Isaiah -- they're exactly about the hereafter ("flesh can't inherit" until "mortality has put on immortality"). That God brings His victories through us keeps us working. That the fruit of the hereafter can oft be tasted here is an extra blessing. Having had your words is an example. But we ain't seen nothin' yet (and won't), till that "another dimension somewhere" which you almost seem to be poo-pooing hits us (not just some future generation) over the head with joy EVERLASTING. "When we all, get together!"
Respectabiggle  Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:39 am
Doc,

Jesus and Paul seemed to accept service in the Roman Legions of that day as acceptable, so I'd say that the US meets that standard. Maybe just barely, but it meets it.

A more thorny question for me is the juxtaposition of Psalm 2 and Romans 13. When is it just to rebel against THAT tyrant over there (e.g., George III) and pacifistically accept martyrdom at the hands of THIS tyrant (e.g., Nero)?
Reagan Schaupp  Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:43 am
Doc, I see what you're saying. To piggyback on Respectabiggle's comment, if Chrict tacitly acknowledged officership in Rome's army--an army engaged, as a rule, in executing the most egregiously unjust campaigns and acts at the whim of rulers who lived like the devil--as a lawful calling, we must ask how a calling to serve in almost any (western?) military could be unlawful prima facie. As a U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel, I certainly have a peace that my calling meets the criteria for a lawful one--not that it would be impossible for me to be quite deluded on the matter. :)
oldfatslow  Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:00 pm
I would be very interested

in reading the advice that

you give to military bound

young men. My #3 boy is

headed to the Army this

summer.


Any chance of seeing that

as a blog post?


ofs
Reagan Schaupp  Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:09 am

Ofs, I’m happy to oblige, but I’m afraid this will come across as pedantic and nothing particularly original. I’ll phrase this as though it were my own son (you never know, I’ve got two under 10!). If folks will excuse me for hijacking the thread, then:


My son, you are answering a calling from God to bear the sword as an agent of the civil magistrate. I’ve prayed since you were born that, among other things, God would claim you for His own and incline your heart toward a lawful profession. Serving in our nation’s Army is that, and I rejoice that He has answered my prayer. As with any other calling, you can do great right or great wrong as you pursue it. If you are wise, you’ll be mindful of several things to enable you to serve God with a whole heart as you serve under your commanders.


Reagan Schaupp  Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:10 am

First, care very little for the praise of men, but rather adorn the gospel with your humility and desire to be a servant. Millions of people in our nation, both elect and not, ascribe special honor to the military profession, seeing it as epsecially noble or sacrificial. Reckon that lightly, my son! It’s all too easy to start believing that because you are “the troops,” going into harm’s way, you and your comrades posess an inherent nobility that others don’t share. It is not so. If all honor and glory goes to the Father, as it must, then none is reserved for you, your battalion, and your Army. Don’t store some up and put it in a corner of your heart anywhere, lest you make an idol of the uniform and the profession. Just as Christ came to serve and point at the Father, so you also do the same.

Reagan Schaupp  Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:10 am

Second, never forget Who is sovereignly in control of events. You will be in danger of violence, and may easily be given lawful orders to visit violence upon other men. As the metal screams around you, never fall into the unbelief of thinking that taking a life is the worst act you may commit. There are lawful targets. Some of them are flesh and blood. Some have wives and children. If you are commanded to kill such, then do it—and do it excellently, as unto the Lord, as you must do all things. The battle is the Lord’s. Don’t freeze up under the idolatrous notion that all taking of life is wrong. On the other hand, avoid the ditch on the opposite side of the path: don’t revel in the violence you lawfully execute. I pray the only satisfaction you feel in victory is that of obedience well rendered in your lawful calling.

Reagan Schaupp  Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:10 am

And third, as you progress through the ranks, you will be increasingly responsible to ensure the sword entrusted to you is used for lawful purposes. Yet you will be serving unbelieving commanders, possibly up to and including the commander-in-chief, who in their unregenerate hearts cannot recognize lawful and unlawful use of the sword. Cling to the Lord; cry out to Him for wisdom to know the difference. As a Private, you will not be expected to have great insight into the lawfulness of a particular campaign; well and good—obey your orders and fight justly. As a battalion commander, and officer, you will be responsible to recognize lawful and unlawful tactics, pursuing the former and putting a stop to the latter. (And as the Chief of Staff of the Army, you must recognize what is and isn’t a lawful reason to take your Army to war in the first place, and advise the Commander in Chief frankly of this.)

Reagan Schaupp  Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:10 am

Last, bless the Lord, your Rock, who prepares your hands for battle and your fingers for war. He, too, is a warrior; He has said it. Reflect His character and conduct in all ways and at all times—behind the desk and in the firefight, in the “plum assignments” and in the mud. Show yourself a man. “Be strong and courageous, and act; do not fear or be dismayed, for the Lord God, my God, is with you. He will not fail you nor forsake you.”

Blake Law  Thursday, January 22, 2009 4:53 pm
US Army National Guard chaplain candidate here, and I would like to thank you, Lt Col Schaupp, for your great counsel. Often I have considered much of what you have written in these comments and, with your permission, I will be using this counsel during my own military vocation.
Jonathan  Monday, February 18, 2013 10:26 am
I don't see how Jesus tacitly approved joining the Roman legion, any more than praising Rehab's faith is a tacit approval of prostitution.