Banner
Let Us Not Inquire About the Chitlins PDF Print E-mail
Thinking Straight - Creation and Food
Written by Douglas Wilson   
Sunday, March 14, 2010 5:30 pm

In his next chapter, Pollan does yeoman's work in putting us off our feed. He does this by taking us to a feedlot in Kansas, an animal city where multitudes of cows are fed corn until the day of slaughter. In the olden days, it took 4-5 years before a cow was slaughtered. Now we get there in 14-16 months. The economies of scale are based on cheap and plentiful corn, and this is why meat is a regular part of the American diet, to a much greater extent than it used to be.

The bulk of this chapter depends on a truth that has nothing to do with the advent of industrial farming. The manufacture and preparation of food can be . . . well, unappetizing. I can easily imagine following my food chain back upstream in 13th century Milan, 19th century New York, or 10th century Rome, and discovering at some point that I was not nearly as hungry as I was before. As Bismarck famously put it, "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." It is probably wise to not inquire too closely into how chitlins come to be either.

Another interesting thing about Pollan's argument is how much it depends on evolution. He is not a writer about food who happens to be an evolutionist -- he

appeals to evolution regularly. It is foundational to his argument. "The short, unhappy life of a corn-fed feedlot steer represents the ultimate triumph of industrial thinking over the logic of evolution" (p. 68). Unfortunately for Pollan's point, the logic of evolution is not, to use a Pollan word, sustainable. Is not industrial thinking itself a product of evolution? Are we not doing a great job multiplying our genes? And isn't that the whole point? Without industrial farming, we could only sustain the life of about 40% of the world's current population. If we were to voluntarily limit our genetic sprawl so that far fewer cows could eat their grass in peace, where is the evolutionary logic in that? Shouldn't the dominant species make the less dominant species eat corn to fatten them up? And isn't evolution about change? Why shouldn't cows learn to eat corn and like it? May take a bit of time, but that's what evolution is all about, right? Time? In short, Pollan's argument, given his premises, collapses on itself.

A Christian anti-evolutionist could have something more substantive to say about all this, but Pollan can't. But the Christian appeal has to be something more than the perennial ick factor. Watching how the chickens get their heads lopped off at Salatin's organic farm is not my idea of an evening's entertainment either.

Another argument is that Pollan wants to show that the result of this industrial approach is that the cows are mostly sick, and because of that, we, the eaters of these cows, are facing various new and strange diseases that our fathers of old did not have to deal with -- the E coli argument, along with its cousins. The problem here is that we are living longer, and considered in the main are far healthier than our forefathers. Sometimes we do get sick, and it is sometimes related to some creepy-crawly microbe that came to us courtesy of a feedlot but, taking one thing with another, we are a lot better off than our great grandparents were. I was in the Navy, for just one example, and we spent a lot of time at sea, and I never met anybody with scurvy.

Pollan does score one point here, however. I don't think he can justify having scored it (given his evolutionism), but I think a Christian could make a case that we ought to quit doing something that Pollan identifies in this chapter. That is the practice of feeding beef tallow to the cows. The FDA, while banning the feeding of ruminant protein to ruminants, does allow for blood products and fat from ruminant animals to be fed to the ruminant animals who showed up a little later for their processing. Thus the cows can have beef tallow mixed into their feed, with that beef tallow coming from the slaughterhouse they are all headed for. I can imagine trying to explain this to Moses, and have him go pop-eyed at me, and saying, "That's just messed up, man!" You know (Dt. 14:21).



Add this page to your favorite Social Networking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo! BlogRolling! Twitter! LinkedIn! TwitThis
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
Luke Welch  Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:51 pm
So Polan says we should side with the view that has no spiritual standard, and then he declares the standardless option more virtuous?

Then he says the natural life actions of animals is better than a manipulated system, but we should not act in ways that humans naturally act in order to progress?

Laissez faire is better than human intervention in food production, and to make this right we should intervene to keep people from producing food the way humans do it?
Rob Lombardi  - Christian View  Sunday, March 14, 2010 11:05 pm
Well, you certainly found some problems in his arguments. People are living longer, but that doesn't mean that Polin doesn't have a legitimate concern. If we are doing things that contribute to dangerous E.Coli mutations that cause the sickness and death, then it does become something of a conscious issue. Do you have a clear conscious contributing to such a system, when alternatives have yet to be adequately explored?

Considering that the results are the death and illness of the innocent, I would think that most Christians should answer no, I wouldn't have a clear conscious if I knew there are alternatives that have yet to be taken seriously.

We buy our meat through a local grass fed operation. I'm impressed by their concern for general human welfare and for working with the amazing eco-system that God created. Grass-fed cows actually live in harmony and in concert with the systems that God has put in place. CAFO's, man-made systems, create all sorts of problems that don't exist in the system that God created. Cows out in the field, move themselves naturally to new food sources, they spread their manure out across the land so there is not a huge mound of it, and they fertilize the ground for continually renewal of the land. It's quite amazing. CAFO's jack the whole system up and create all sorts of new problems that are not only expensive to solve, but can be dangerous to people who live near them and consume their food.
Douglas Wilson  Monday, March 15, 2010 5:30 am
Rob, but human lives are at risk, and will be lost either direction we go. There is no such thing as absolute food safety.
Rob Lombardi  - Be good to your neighbor.  Monday, March 15, 2010 4:46 pm
Certainly, we are in a fallen world and God is sovereign. Yet don't forget man's responsible to do right when the choice is laid before him. I think the road to take is fairly clear when looking at the available evidences and the availability of reasonable alternatives.

If I was poor, or located in a place where alternatives are not available, I would consider that I could, with a clear conscience, continue doing things the way I currently do them. But for those whom much is given, whether it is knowledge or money, much is expected.

I'm in California where there is easy access to a local grass-fed rancher. We have to go through the trouble of meeting with him at a particular time of the year and storing the meat in our freezer. However, it's a small amount of trouble for what seems like the right way to go.

The meat tastes better in my opinion and the price is less than $6 per lb for up to an entire cow. We get a split-half.
oldfatslow  - How Offal  Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:19 pm
Chickens are cannibals too.
From my days as an auditor
of chicken plants, I found
out that everything that
doesn't leave the plant
bound for KFC gets collected,
marketed as a commodity called
offal, and rendered back into
chicken feed. We all may
end up with mad cluck disease.

Trivia question: What's the
difference between a Rock
Cornish Game Hen and a
chicken?

ofs
Tammy  - Grass-fed cows get butchered between 18 months and  Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:17 pm
While grass-finished cows may take longer than feedlot finished animals, they certainly do NOT take 4 - 5 years to do so. We butcher most of our grass-finished cows at around 24- 30 months, a far cry from 4 - 5 years.
oldfatslow  - re: How Offal  Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:30 am
oldfatslow wrote:
Trivia question: What's the
difference between a Rock
Cornish Game Hen and a
chicken?


The answer is two weeks.
It's the difference between
a five week and a seven week
old chicken.

ofs